Ironsides Macroeconomics 'It's Never Different This Time'

Ironsides Macroeconomics 'It's Never Different This Time'

Share this post

Ironsides Macroeconomics 'It's Never Different This Time'
Ironsides Macroeconomics 'It's Never Different This Time'
Appropriate Adjustment

Appropriate Adjustment

Correction likely over, policy inflexibility, GDP gaps, S&P margins and capex

Barry C. Knapp's avatar
Barry C. Knapp
Jan 29, 2022
∙ Paid

Share this post

Ironsides Macroeconomics 'It's Never Different This Time'
Ironsides Macroeconomics 'It's Never Different This Time'
Appropriate Adjustment
Share

Appropriate Adjustment

In last week’s note, Bills Only Policy, we detailed our framework for an appropriate adjustment to a significant inflection in Fed monetary policy normalization. There is a good deal of business cycle history enhanced by eight risk-off episodes during the Fed’s start/stop attempts to normalize policy following the largest financial crisis since 1931. That history implied an average 11% drop in the S&P 500, as of Monday mid-day the index was down 12%, Nasdaq -17%, and the Russell 2000 small cap index -21%. Bitcoin had rallied from $30,000, when the Fed expected below 2% inflation, to $65,000 when they acknowledged their forecast failure, then plunged back to $35,000 as the political winds shifted and Fed policy pivoted sharply. Turns out, bitcoin worked well as an inflation ‘hedge’, though based on what we heard last week we are less than convinced this Fed has the political will or technical skill to use their tools effectively to stabilize prices. In other words, our '60s analog, when the costs of being the world’s reserve currency became politically prohibitive, remains on track despite the Fed’s hawkish pivot. The bitcoin as digital gold due to monetary debasement thesis is not dead yet.

 A week ago, Friday, we were not quite ready to declare the policy normalization correction complete due some missing characteristics of a full risk-off episode. By Monday morning, the term structure of the VIX curve (1-month less 6-month future) inverted sharply, the VIX spiked to 39% and our aggregate equity index volatility risk index was 3 standard deviations above its longer-run median. All the parameters of a Fed policy correction had been met. Some argued that Chairman Powell’s press conference was more hawkish than expected. We view his commentary, and the rates market reaction, as marginally unfavorable to risk assets, but not enough to justify a further decline in equities. More thoughtful responses to questions about the Fed’s balance sheet could have prevented curve flattening that exacerbated concerns that the Fed is tightening into slowing growth.

Figure 1: Here are the 5s30s and 2s10s, 2-year forward curves, they offer info about longer term expectations. Former NY Fed President Dudley offered a caveat to interpreting these curves and the level of long rates generally when he said that term premiums are suppressed by Fed purchases (and holdings). That said, one key difference between the 2014 and 2021/2 tapers, the average duration of Fed purchases during QE3 was 12 years, during the pandemic program it was 6 years. Additionally, demand for rate sensitive sectors, housing, autos and durables was weak in the early ‘10s, but it is robust today. In other words, curve flattening in 2014 was acceptable, today it will make the inflation process worse.

This post is for paid subscribers

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Barry C. Knapp
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share