Adverse Aggregate Demand Shock(s)
Tariffs reduce employment, the pandemic distorted the delayed employment report, the BLS and Fed might steal the Santa rally, reducing risk
In this week’s note…
Hawkish FOMC participants are arguing the increase in unemployment and 150-year history of tariffs triggering an adverse aggregate demand shock are betting, it’s different this time.
A crucial channel for demand shocks is business confidence, or uncertainty in econ-speak. There is plenty of evidence during the ‘18-’19 trade war, and the 8-months since Liberation Day that the trade shock reduced capital spending plans and employment.
The delayed September employment report headline was flattered by the same pandemic corrupted seasonal adjustment factors that boosted employment in the 16-24 age cohort. Labor demand is contracting faster than supply. The unemployment rate is up a full percent from the cycle low.
Fed President’s Logan and Hammack want to lean against the AI bubble, they should accelerate DT and reduce the policy rate to 3% to rebalance policy and reduce the inflationary debt monetization impulse.
We are modestly reducing portfolio risk by lowering our exposure to small caps, materials and energy.


